257) Proof of Crime Patrol true stories ::: Karnataka gangsters, goons, rowdies, guns, shootouts, murders, gangwars

Gun owner gets bail in ‘uncle’s murder’ case

He had lent weapon thinking it would be used to shoot birds

A person who had lent his gun to a friend’s friend, in the belief that it will be used for shooting birds, has become an accused in a murder case. After spending two months in jail, he has been granted bail after he submitted to the court, his side of the story.

Nithyanandan is the gun owner and Hanumantharayappa, a retired school teacher, his friend, who borrowed it from him and gave it to one Ravi Kumar Gowda. Nithyanandan was allegedly under the impression that Gowda wanted to shoot some birds in the village with the gun.

The police case is that 41-year-old Muddu Krishnappa, a financier, was shot dead on October 13 this year, while travelling on a bike in Doddaballapur. His nephew, Ravi Kumar Gowda, is the main accused, who allegedly shot his uncle dead as the latter refused to partition the family’s ancestral property. There are eight other accused in the case and police have seized two guns; one a single barrel muzzle loading gun and the second, a smooth-bore breech loading gun.

Apart from Nithyanandan BH, and Hanumantharayappa aka Kurudu Meshtru, the other accused are Ramanjinappa, MS Jagadish, Varadaraju, N Outtachaar, L Srinivas, GR Krishnappa and G Bommasandra.

Nithyananda and Bommasandra are the owners of the two guns. Hanumantharayappa allegedly helped Gowda get the second gun from Nithyanandan. After the shootout, Gowda himself shifted his uncle to hospital, where he died.

Nithyanandan is now accused number five and Hanumantharayappa accused number four in the case where the crimes alleged include murder and under the Arms Act. Nithyanandan’s advocate argued before the HC that he had a licence for the gun and he had given it without live cartridges thinking it would be used to scare birds.

The HC noted that there is no material against Nithyananda about his participation in the firing at the deceased and committing his murder.

The same went for Hanumantharayappa.Considering that both these accused promised to abide by any conditions imposed on them for bail, the HC granted them bail last week.

Amar Alva’s murder accused walks free

Ashok Shetty was booked under TADA for the sensational 1992 murder; HC has quashed the case against him

The sensational murder of Amar Alva (in pic), a Mangaluru strongman, in 1992 changed the course of the underworld in Karnataka. However, there is nothing the police and prosecution can be proud of as the case against the last of the seven accused, Ashok Shetty, has been quashed by the High Court. This comes four months after the case against another accused, Udaya Shetty, was quashed. All seven accused are now free.

Ashok Shetty is the fifth of the seven accused in the murder of Amar Alva. Shetty was booked under various sections of the IPC Arms Act and the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, better known as TADA. Ashok Shetty along with the other accused Udaya Shetty were absconding and the case against them was split up.

The other five accused in the case were acquitted by the trial court in 1996. The case against Udaya Shetty was also quashed earlier this year. The case against the accused was that they were hiding in Goa after looting Rs 6 lakh in Udupi in 1991. Amar Alva was shadowing them and fearing him they decided to eliminate him. Ashok Shetty who was in Dubai was contacted by the other accused to help them kill Alva.

Alva was shot dead on July 14, 1992, in front of Super Bazar near Milagres Church, Mangaluru. Manjunath Shetty, Vijaya Nayak, Kedarnath Shetty, Ramesh Bhat, Sachith Kumar, Sudarshan, Jagannath Shetty and Balakrishna Rai, who were with Alva at that time were injured in the shootout.

The High Court in its recent judgment quashing the case against Ashok Shetty said, “The main accused are accused Nos. 1 to 3 and they are already acquitted by the Court. Therefore, in my opinion when there is no separate and distinct allegations and the prosecution already put in evidence against accused Nos. 1 to 3 and others, perhaps the prosecution may not have separate evidence against this petitioner also.”

The HC cited earlier judgments where cases against coaccused were quashed after the main accused were acquitted, saying “In such circumstances it will be an exercise in futility to make the petitioner to undergo the ordeal of crime, and then to be acquitted. Holding that the proceeding against the accused person who was absconding and subsequently against whom a split up charge sheet was filed was quashed.”

Quashing the case against Ashok Shetty, the HC said, “In view of the above said facts and circumstances and the law laid down for above said case, it is just and necessary to quash the entire proceedings against this petitioner as the petitioner also stand on the same footing as that of accused No. 6 (Udaya Shetty)”.


Amar Alva was alleged to be the link between the Mumbai and Bengaluru underworlds. Amar Alva, for all practical purposes, was a prosperous businesses and social worker. After his murder, guns became the mainstay of underworld elements in Karnataka. His alleged aide was accused of a murder attempt on Muthappa Rai in Bengaluru later.



Author: Ravikanth K.A.

I am a Rajakaluve and Lake encroachment investigator, advisor, consultant. Ravikanth is my name. I can tell you exactly which property is safe for you to buy and which one is not safe, even to be considered or given a second look, from the perspective of lake or rajakaluve or storm water drain encroachment and property demolition possibilities in the future (that will lead to your ultimate financial destruction). Below is given a brief description about my skills and the value addition that I can bring to your property purchase endeavour, when you plan to buy some property somewhere in Bangalore. Contact me on 8884284819 for appointment for a paid consultancy (on commercial terms) to get your property that you are planning to buy checked – to see if it has got any encroachment into any water body like a rajakaluve/storm water drain/naala/nala/water feeder canal or a lake etc. Even if it is in the no-construction zone, called buffer zone of a lake or a rajakaluve, as per NGT Rules and norms, you are not supposed to buy the property and if you do, you could be in trouble with demolition threats going forward (in the future) from the concerned authorities. Hence, dont by penny wise and pound foolish. Get your property checked by me before buying anything blindly anywhere in Karnataka especially in Bangalore. Contact me on 8884284819 for an expert opinion on all rajakaluve and lake encroachment investigation, advise and consultancy of any property that you wish to buy anywhere in Bangalore, both urban and rural areas (including the outskirts) of Bangalore. Connect with me – Ravikanth, to get your property papers investigated by me for encroachment related issues and also to find out how you can explore real estate opportunities with me – for advice on Real Estate Investment anywhere in Bangalore – Any Locality – Anywhere in Bangalore’s vast land mass of 8005 sq.km

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s